Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39065603›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2024

Casgevy: Innovative Medicinal Products Require Innovative Approaches to Regulatory Assessment.

Essam Kerwash, John D Johnston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Advancing Precision Medicine: Recent Innovations in Gene Editing Technologies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Essam KerwashMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4368-8565
John D JohnstonMedicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), 10 South Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 4PU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Casgevy (exa-cel) is an autologous cellular therapy modified ex vivo by a CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene-editing technology. For Casgevy to be granted the indication in transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia, one single-arm trial was submitted which was not amenable to conventional statistical analysis of 'effect of cause'. Therefore, an analysis was conducted on the basis of 'cause of effect' making use of the scheme described by Toulmin coupled to an analysis of causal inference. Based on the current data within the submitted study: subjects with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia no longer needed a red blood cell transfusion with a 93-percent probability if and only if administered Casgevy; PNS = 93%. It is acknowledged that unknown elements of safety may yet be revealed by long-term follow-up of recipients of Casgevy. Its durability of efficacy is, at present, also an unknown that may also be ascertained by long-term follow-up of recipients. The limitations of a causal analysis are related to assumptions of the proposed causal structure which may not capture the complexity of the real world. Overall, the claim that Casgevy is indicated to treat people with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia is considered to be supported by the results of the submitted study; the benefit-risk evaluation of Casgevy is found to be positive.

Indexed as

CasgevyCRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene-editing technologyeffect of cause analysisToulmin schemetransfusion-dependent β-thalassemia

Identifiers

PMID39065603
PMCPMC11279610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.