Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39065310›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Cactus Pear Mucilage (

Brandon Van Rooyen, Maryna De Wit, Gernot Osthoff, Johan Van Niekerk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brandon Van RooyenDepartment of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa.
Maryna De WitDepartment of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0883-5099
Gernot OsthoffDepartment of Microbiology and Biochemistry, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1008-4602
Johan Van NiekerkDepartment of Sustainable Food Systems and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The investigation of novel, natural polymers has gained considerably more exposure for their desirable, often specific, functional properties. Multiple researchers have explored these biopolymers to determine their potential to address many food processing, packaging and environmental concerns. Mucilage from the cactus pear (

Indexed as

biofilmsbiopolymercactus pear mucilagefunctional propertiesmucilage extractionOpuntia ficus-indicarheology

Identifiers

PMID39065310
PMCPMC11281074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.