Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39065268›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2024

Inhibition of Microbial Growth and Biofilm Formation in Pure and Mixed Bacterial Samples.

John D Cate, Young Z Sullivan, Maria D King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial vaginosis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John D CateBiological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Young Z SullivanBiological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Maria D KingBiological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-7387

Funding

Mitigation of ventilation-based resuspension and spread of airborne viruses in nosocomial and healthcare settingsR21AI169046 · NIAID · TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE RESEARCH · PI KING, MARIA DOBOZI · 2023 to 2024
$400k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI169046NIH HHS 5R21AI169046-02A1NSF CBET 2034048USDA NIFA Hatch Project TEX09746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, requires large amounts of water to extract fossil fuel from rock formations. As a result of hydraulic fracturing, the briny wastewater, often termed back-produced fracturing or fracking water (FW), is pumped into holding ponds. One of the biggest challenges with produced water management is controlling microbial activity that could reduce the pond water's reusable layer and pose a significant environmental hazard. This study focuses on the characterization of back-produced water that has been hydraulically fractured using chemical and biological analysis and the development of a high-throughput screening method to evaluate and predict the antimicrobial effect of four naturally and commercially available acidic inhibitors (edetic acid, boric acid, tannic acid, and lactic acid) on the growth of the FW microbiome. Liquid cultures and biofilms of two laboratory model strains, the vegetative

Indexed as

back-produced fracturing waterbacteriabiofilmmicrobiomenatural antimicrobialsplanktonicsessile

Identifiers

PMID39065268
PMCPMC11278618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.