ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Insights into the Interaction Mechanisms of Peptide and Non-Peptide Inhibitors with MDM2 Using Gaussian-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Deep Learning.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- FDA-Approved Drug Repurposing as p53 Mutants Rescue Candidates Using Structure-Based Virtual Screening and Molecular Simulations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- MD Simulation of Vector-Receptor Pharmacologic Pairs for Tumor-Specific Drug Delivery: Transfer of Boron Atoms by RGD Peptide to αvβ3 Integrin Receptor.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Recent Progress and Prospect in Studying Selective Inhibitors Toward Bromodomain Family Members.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Investigating the binding mechanism of AML inhibitors based on panobinostat with HDAC3 proteins using Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics.RSC advances · 2025Article
- Identifying Inhibitor-SARS-CoV2-3CLMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inhibiting MDM2-p53 interaction is considered an efficient mode of cancer treatment. In our current study, Gaussian-accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD), deep learning (DL), and binding free energy calculations were combined together to probe the binding mechanism of non-peptide inhibitors K23 and 0Y7 and peptide ones PDI6W and PDI to MDM2. The GaMD trajectory-based DL approach successfully identified significant functional domains, predominantly located at the helixes α2 and α2', as well as the β-strands and loops between α2 and α2'. The post-processing analysis of the GaMD simulations indicated that inhibitor binding highly influences the structural flexibility and collective motions of MDM2. Calculations of molecular mechanics-generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA) and solvated interaction energy (SIE) not only suggest that the ranking of the calculated binding free energies is in agreement with that of the experimental results, but also verify that van der Walls interactions are the primary forces responsible for inhibitor-MDM2 binding. Our findings also indicate that peptide inhibitors yield more interaction contacts with MDM2 compared to non-peptide inhibitors. Principal component analysis (PCA) and free energy landscape (FEL) analysis indicated that the piperidinone inhibitor 0Y7 shows the most pronounced impact on the free energy profiles of MDM2, with the piperidinone inhibitor demonstrating higher fluctuation amplitudes along primary eigenvectors. The hot spots of MDM2 revealed by residue-based free energy estimation provide target sites for drug design toward MDM2. This study is expected to provide useful theoretical aid for the development of selective inhibitors of MDM2 family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.