ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Quantum Mechanics Characterization of Non-Covalent Interaction in Nucleotide Fragments.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational identification and mechanistic characterization of natural product binders targeting the PDE6D prenyl binding tunnel.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- From Fragile to Firm: Reinforcement of Excess Electron Binding in Dipole-Bound Anions through Sigma-Hole and Hydrogen-Bond Interactions.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate calculation of non-covalent interaction energies in nucleotides is crucial for understanding the driving forces governing nucleic acid structure and function, as well as developing advanced molecular mechanics forcefields or machine learning potentials tailored to nucleic acids. Here, we dissect the nucleotides' structure into three main constituents: nucleobases (A, G, C, T, and U), sugar moieties (ribose and deoxyribose), and phosphate group. The interactions among these fragments and between fragments and water were analyzed. Different quantum mechanical methods were compared for their accuracy in capturing the interaction energy. The non-covalent interaction energy was decomposed into electrostatics, exchange-repulsion, dispersion, and induction using two ab initio methods: Symmetry-Adapted Perturbation Theory (SAPT) and Absolutely Localized Molecular Orbitals (ALMO). These calculations provide a benchmark for different QM methods, in addition to providing a valuable understanding of the roles of various intermolecular forces in hydrogen bonding and aromatic stacking. With SAPT, a higher theory level and/or larger basis set did not necessarily give more accuracy. It is hard to know which combination would be best for a given system. In contrast, ALMO EDA2 did not show dependence on theory level or basis set; additionally, it is faster.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.