Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064816›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2024

Bovine Milk Fat Globule Membrane Supplementation and Neurocognitive Development: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Therdpong Thongseiratch, Kulnipa Kittisakmontri, Nutthaporn Chandeying

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Therdpong ThongseiratchChild Development Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-6106
Kulnipa KittisakmontriDivision of Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Nutthaporn ChandeyingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University, Bangkok 10300, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the limited evidence, there is no conclusive proof of the neurocognitive benefits of bovine milk fat globule membrane supplementation in infant formula. This study evaluates the neurocognitive benefits of bovine milk fat globule membrane supplementation in formula, comparing it to standard formula and assessing its noninferiority to breast milk. Data were sourced from studies published between January 2000 and March 2024 from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase. Eight randomized controlled trials involving 1352 healthy term neonates, infants, and children up to 2 years old were included. Bovine milk fat globule membrane supplementation was significantly associated with improved cognitive development (mean difference: 3.29, 95% CI: 1.65 to 4.93,

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCognitionDietary SupplementsGlycolipidsGlycoproteinsInfant FormulaLipid DropletsAnimalsCattleChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMaleGlycolipidsGlycoproteinsmilk fat globulebovine milk fat globule membranecognitive developmentinfant formulainfant nutritionneurocognitive development

Identifiers

PMID39064816
PMCPMC11280009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.