Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064642›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2024

A Comparative Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Folate-Based B Vitamin Intervention on Cognitive Function of Older Adults under Mandatory Folic Acid Fortification Policy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Liyang Zhang, Xukun Chen, Yongjie Chen, Jing Yan, Guowei Huang, Wen Li

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Natural Molecules for Brain Health and Resilience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liyang ZhangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin 300070, China.
Xukun ChenDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin 300070, China.
Yongjie ChenDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China.
Jing YanTianjin Key Laboratory of Environment, Nutrition and Public Health, Tianjin 300070, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-8451
Guowei HuangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin 300070, China.
Wen LiDepartment of Nutrition and Food Science, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Heping District, Tianjin 300070, China.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2022YFC2010100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The policies regarding the mandatory fortification of food with folic acid (FA) may impact the effectiveness of folate-based B vitamin treatment on cognitive function in older adults. We critically and systematically review the literature to assess whether food fortification policies affect folate-based B vitamin treatment efficacy on cognition function in older adults. Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI, were searched for "Cognitive Function", "Folate", and "Older Adults". The study had specific criteria for inclusion, which were as follows: (1) the studies should initially have randomized controlled trials that were conducted on older adults aged 60 or above; (2) the studies must assess the relationship between folate status and cognitive performance; and (3) the studies should clarify the policies regarding food fortification with FA. This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Two reviewers independently extracted all the data, and any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. All the data collected were compiled, compared, and analyzed critically. Random effects models were used to assess the effects of interventions. The systematic review included fifty-one articles involving 42,768 participants. Of these, the 23 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis on the effects of folate-based B vitamin supplementation on cognitive function showed a significant overall impact (Z = 3.84;

Indexed as

CognitionFolic AcidFood, FortifiedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin B ComplexAgedDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition PolicyFolic AcidVitamin B Complexcognitive functionfolic acidmandatory fortification policymeta-analysisolder adults

Identifiers

PMID39064642
PMCPMC11279592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.