Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064549›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2024

Endoscopic Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Priyadarshini Loganathan, Mahesh Gajendran, Abhilash Perisetti, Hemant Goyal, Rupinder Mann, Randy Wright, Shreyas Saligram, Nirav Thosani, Chandraprakash Umapathy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Priyadarshini LoganathanDivision of Gastroenterology & Nutrition, The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4247-2412
Mahesh GajendranDivision of Gastroenterology & Nutrition, The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Abhilash PerisettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, MO 64128, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-6395
Hemant GoyalDepartment of Gastroenterology, Borland Groover, Baptist Medical Center-Downtown, Jacksonville, FL 32207, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-9042
Rupinder MannDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
Randy WrightDivision of Gastroenterology & Nutrition, The University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Shreyas SaligramDepartment of Gastroenterology, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6189-260X
Nirav ThosaniDepartment of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4607-6241
Chandraprakash UmapathyDivision of Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases that occurs secondary to failure of the antireflux barrier system, resulting in the frequent and abnormal reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. GERD is diagnosed in routine clinical practice based on the classic symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. However, a subset of patients with atypical symptoms can pose challenges in diagnosing GERD. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is the most common initial diagnostic test used in the assessment for GERD, although half of these patients will not have any positive endoscopic findings suggestive of GERD. The advanced endoscopic techniques have improved the diagnostic yield of GERD diagnosis and its complications, such as Barrett's esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma. These newer endoscopic tools can better detect subtle irregularities in the mucosa and vascular structures. The management options for GERD include lifestyle modifications, pharmacological therapy, and endoscopic and surgical interventions. The latest addition to the armamentarium is the minimally invasive endoscopic interventions in carefully selected patients, including the electrical stimulation of the LES, Antireflux mucosectomy, Radiofrequency therapy, Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication, Endoscopic Full-Thickness plication (GERDx™), and suturing devices. With the emergence of these advanced endoscopic techniques, it is crucial to understand their selection criteria, advantages, and disadvantages.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxEndoscopy, Digestive SystemFundoplicationHumansendoscopyesophageal capsule endoscopyFICEgastroesophageal reflux diseaseGERDI-scanNarrow Band Imagingtransoral incisionless fundoplication

Identifiers

PMID39064549
PMCPMC11278532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.