ArticleMicromachines2024
Morse Code Recognition Based on a Flexible Tactile Sensor with Carbon Nanotube/Polyurethane Sponge Material by the Long Short-Term Memory Model.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Morse code recognition plays a very important role in the application of human-machine interaction. In this paper, based on the carbon nanotube (CNT) and polyurethane sponge (PUS) composite material, a flexible tactile CNT/PUS sensor with great piezoresistive characteristic is developed for detecting Morse code precisely. Thirty-six types of Morse code, including 26 letters (A-Z) and 10 numbers (0-9), are applied to the sensor. Each Morse code was repeated 60 times, and 2160 (36 × 60) groups of voltage time-sequential signals were collected to construct the dataset. Then, smoothing and normalization methods are used to preprocess and optimize the raw data. Based on that, the long short-term memory (LSTM) model with excellent feature extraction and self-adaptive ability is constructed to precisely recognize different types of Morse code detected by the sensor. The recognition accuracies of the 10-number Morse code, the 26-letter Morse code, and the whole 36-type Morse code are 99.17%, 95.37%, and 93.98%, respectively. Meanwhile, the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF) models are built to distinguish the 36-type Morse code (letters of A-Z and numbers of 0-9) based on the same dataset and achieve the accuracies of 91.37%, 88.88%, 87.04%, and 90.97%, respectively, which are all lower than the accuracy of 93.98% based on the LSTM model. All the experimental results show that the CNT/PUS sensor can detect the Morse code's tactile feature precisely, and the LSTM model has a very efficient property in recognizing Morse code detected by the CNT/PUS sensor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.