ArticleMicromachines2024
High-Porosity Sieve-Type Neural Electrodes for Motor Function Recovery and Nerve Signal Acquisition.
Article in Micromachines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Scaling beyond the vagus nerve: historical and contemporary progress on electrode-based small-diameter peripheral nerve interfaces.Bioelectronic medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the effects of electrode porosity on nerve regeneration and functional recovery after sciatic nerve transection in rats was investigated. A sieve-type neural electrode with 70% porosity was designed and compared with an electrode with 30% porosity. Electrodes were fabricated from photosensitive polyimide and implanted into the transected sciatic nerves. Motor function recovery was evaluated using the Sciatic Function Index. The number of active channels and their signal quality were recorded and analyzed to assess the sensory neural signal acquisition. Electrical impedance spectroscopy was used to evaluate the electrode performance. The group implanted with the 70% porosity electrode demonstrated significantly enhanced nerve regeneration and motor function recovery, approaching control group levels by the fifth week. In contrast, the group with the 30% porosity electrode exhibited limited improvement. Immunohistochemical analysis confirmed extensive nerve fiber growth within the 70% porous structure. Moreover, the 70% porosity electrode consistently acquired neural signals from more channels compared to the 30% porosity electrode, demonstrating its superior performance in sensory signal detection. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing electrode porosity in the development of advanced neural interfaces, with the potential to enhance clinical outcomes in peripheral nerve repair and neuroprosthetic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.