Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064308›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Comprehensive Approaches to Urolithiasis in Renal Transplants: A Narrative Review.

Catalina Solano, Mariela Corrales, Frédéric Panthier, Steeve Doizi, Olivier Traxer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catalina SolanoGRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4088-1848
Mariela CorralesGRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1461-8464
Frédéric PanthierGRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3055-2984
Steeve DoiziGRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France.
Olivier TraxerGRC n20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review addresses the management of urolithiasis in renal transplant recipients, a notably vulnerable group due to the unique anatomical and physiological alterations of the transplanted organ. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis in these patients varies between 0.1% and 6.3%, with a significant impact on graft longevity and function. Surgical access complications due to the renal graft's position on the iliac vessels and the variety of urinary anastomoses complicate the treatment approaches. This study evaluates the effectiveness and outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopy (URS), two primary minimally invasive strategies for managing graft stones. Through a narrative review using the PubMed and EMBASE databases, it was found that PCNL offers high stone-free rates especially beneficial for large stones, whereas URS provides a less invasive option with a lower risk of complications for small stones. Both techniques require tailored approaches based on stone composition-mostly calcium oxalate-and specific patient anatomical factors. This review underscores the importance of early diagnosis, appropriate treatment selection, and continuous post-treatment monitoring to mitigate risks and promote long-term renal function in transplant recipients.

Indexed as

kidney transplantationpercutaneous nephrolithotomyureteroscopyurolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID39064308
PMCPMC11278228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.