ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Sex Differences in Aortic Stenosis: From the Pathophysiology to the Intervention, Current Challenges, and Future Perspectives.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moderate aortic stenosis: diagnostic pitfalls and the role of multimodality imaging in risk stratification and clinical management.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- The potential role of sex related differences of the microbiome and its impact on calcific aortic stenosis: a narrative review.Biology of sex differences · 2026Review
- Sex Differences Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Single-Center Observational Study.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Observational
- Sex-specific utility of pulmonary artery metrics in predicting pulmonary hypertension and survival after TAVI: insights from advanced CT imaging.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Red blood cell distribution width and blood transfusions are associated with 2-year mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in males but not in females: sex-related differences in hematological predictors.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Specificities of Aortic Stenosis in Women - From Diagnosis to Management.Saudi medical journal · 2026Review
- Sex-Related Differences in Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Aortic Valve Replacement with Perceval Sutureless Valve.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Women With Moderate or Severe Aortic Stenosis by Aortic Valve Area Are Disproportionately Classified With Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis and Assigned Lower Severity Grades Than Men.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcific aortic stenosis (AS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in high-income countries. AS presents sex-specific features impacting pathophysiology, outcomes, and management strategies. In women, AS often manifests with a high valvular fibrotic burden, small valvular annuli, concentric left ventricular (LV) remodeling/hypertrophy, and, frequently, supernormal LV ejection fraction coupled with diastolic dysfunction. Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS epitomizes these traits, posing significant challenges post-aortic valve replacement due to limited positive remodeling and significant risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Conversely, men present more commonly with LV dilatation and dysfunction, indicating the phenotype of classical low-flow low-gradient AS, i.e., with decreased LV ejection fraction. However, these distinctions have not been fully incorporated into guidelines for AS management. The only treatment for AS is aortic valve replacement; women are frequently referred late, leading to increased heart damage caused by AS. Therefore, it is important to reassess surgical planning and timing to minimize irreversible cardiac damage in women. The integrity and the consideration of sex differences in the management of AS is critical. Further research, including sufficient representation of women, is needed to investigate these differences and to develop individualized, sex-specific management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.