Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064273›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2024

Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Migrated in the Urinary Tract: Case Report and Extensive Literature Review.

Valentin Nicolae Varlas, Andreea Ioana Meianu, Andra Ioana Rădoi, Irina Balescu, Nicolae Bacalbasa, Roxana Georgiana Varlas

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Wrongful Migration: A Hidden Culprit Behind Flank Pain.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Valentin Nicolae VarlasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8342-9819
Andreea Ioana MeianuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania.
Andra Ioana RădoiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, 011132 Bucharest, Romania.
Irina BalescuDoctoral School, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Nicolae BacalbasaDepartment of Surgery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Roxana Georgiana VarlasDoctoral School, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The migration or translocation of an intrauterine device (IUD) in the urinary tract is a rare event. Here, we present the case of a 55-year-old woman who accidentally discovered the ectopic presence of an IUD following a radiological examination for pelvic pain caused by a lumbar discopathy. Over the years, the patient had several IUDs inserted without being able to specify which one had migrated. The removal of the IUD was performed laparoscopically with the minimum resection of the bladder wall and the subsequent cystorrhaphy. The evolution of the patient was favorable. To better analyze these events, we conducted an all-time extensive electronic search of the PubMed database and identified 94 eligible articles, with a total of 115 cases. The literature analysis on the IUD migrations shows either the simultaneous existence of the second IUD or of a maximum number of up to two IUD insertions during the life of patients. Thus, in the presented case, we identified five IUD insertions over time, which explained the chronic inflammatory process by forming an important mass of adherents that included the urinary bladder, uterus, omentum, sigmoid colon, and abdominal wall. Therapeutic management must be adapted to each case depending on the intra/extravesical location of the migrated IUD evaluated by imaging.

Indexed as

bladderembedmentintraperitoneallyintrauterine devicemigrationtranslocatedureterurinary tract

Identifiers

PMID39064273
PMCPMC11278257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.