ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Revisiting Latex-Fruit Syndrome after 30 Years of Research: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Description of Two Cases.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Allergenic Potential for Cross-Reactivity of Olive (Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of a food enzyme containing endo-polygalacturonase and pectin lyase activities from the non-genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-polygalacturonase from the non-genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Safety evaluation of a food enzyme containing arabinan endo-1,5-α-l-arabinanase and endo-polygalacturonase activities from the non-genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Wheat Allergy in the Era of Precision Medicine: From Novel Molecular Markers to New Therapeutic Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Editorial: Allergen cross-reactivity - a challenge in daily practice.Frontiers in allergy · 2026Article
- Latex allergy and medical aspects of the use of latex products.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Review
- Natural rubber latex allergy: causes, symptoms, and modern diagnostic methods.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2026Review
- Exercise-Induced Angioedema, Urticaria, and Anaphylaxis-A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Safety evaluation of the food enzyme endo-polygalacturonase from the genetically modifiedEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thirty years have passed since the concept of latex-fruit syndrome (LFS) was first introduced. Since then, this phenomenon, characterized by cross-reactivity between natural latex rubber allergens and certain fruit allergens, has been extensively studied. This literature review sought to determine the prevalence of LFS in latex-allergic patients, identify the most common cross-reactions with fruit allergens in individuals with LFS, and understand the clinical manifestations of this syndrome. An extensive literature search was carried out using PubMed and Scopus databases, while applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology. The analysis of original studies revealed a wide variation in LFS prevalence (4-88%) influenced by diverse diagnostic tools, different geographical regions, and the size of study populations. Our findings indicate that the most prevalent allergenic fruits in patients with LFS are banana, avocado, kiwifruit, and papaya. After evaluating the symptoms of the fruit hypersensitivity of patients with LFS, the clinical manifestation of hypersensitivity constituted 73% of systemic allergy symptoms and only 27% of reported symptoms described the localized allergy. Furthermore, the clinical picture of latex-fruit syndrome is illustrated through two cases, one typical and one with an unusual presentation. Their clinical features were assessed and contrasted utilizing different anaphylaxis severity grading criteria. To properly manage LFS, it is essential to establish standardized diagnostic criteria and severity grading systems, as these are crucial for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.