ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
Myocardial Ischemia: Differentiating between Epicardial Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis, Microvascular Dysfunction and Vasospasm in the Catheterization Laboratory.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stachydrine: A Systematic Review of Its Multi-Targeted Therapeutic Potential in Cardiovascular, Oncology, Renal, Gynecological, and Inflammatory Disorders.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- From Intracoronary Physiology to Endotype-Based Treatment: Quality of Life Improvement for INOCA Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease is currently the most common cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Although myocardial ischemia is classically determined by epicardial coronary atherosclerosis, up to 40% of patients referred for coronary angiography have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) has typically been underestimated in the past because, until recently, its prognostic significance was not completely clear. This review aims to highlight differences and patterns in myocardial ischemia caused by epicardial obstructive CAD, coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) or vasomotor abnormalities and to elucidate the state of the art in correctly diagnosing these different patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.