ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
A Comprehensive Geriatric Workup and Frailty Assessment in Older Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends and Projections for Aortic Stenosis and Hypertension-Related Mortality Among Older Adults in the United States: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Nutritional Status and Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: Clinical Perspectives from Mechanisms to Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Frailty in acute coronary syndrome: From risk stratification to clinical decision-making.World journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Core Competencies of the Modern Geriatric Cardiologist: A Framework for Comprehensive Cardiovascular Care in Older Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Does severe pulmonary hypertension affect long-term survival after TAVI for severe aortic stenosis?The British journal of cardiology · 2026Article
- Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Focal Disease in Older and Complex Patients-What Could Be the Best Time for an Appropriate Interventional Treatment?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Behavioural Cardiology: A Review on an Expanding Field of Cardiology-Holistic Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: A Whole New Ballgame?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- State of the Art in Measuring Frailty in Patients With Heart Failure: from Diagnosis to Advanced Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Long-Term Outcome of Elderly Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing a Tailored Interventional Treatment Using Frailty-Based Management: Beyond the Five-Year Horizon.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Acute Coronary Syndrome in Elderly Patients: How to Tackle Them?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic stenosis (AS) represents a notable paradigm for cardiovascular (CV) and geriatric disorders owing to comorbidity. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was initially considered a therapeutic strategy in elderly individuals deemed unsuitable for or at high risk of surgical valve replacement. The progressive improvement in TAVR technology has led to the need to refine older patients' stratification, progressively incorporating the concept of frailty and other geriatric vulnerabilities. Recognizing the intricate nature of the aging process, reliance exclusively on chronological age for stratification resulted in an initial but inadequate tool to assess both CV and non-CV risks effectively. A comprehensive geriatric evaluation should be performed before TAVR procedures, taking into account both physical and cognitive capabilities and post-procedural outcomes through a multidisciplinary framework. This review adopts a multidisciplinary perspective to delve into the diagnosis and holistic management of AS in elderly populations in order to facilitate decision-making, thereby optimizing outcomes centered around patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.