Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064152›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Contemporary Treatment of NMIBC-Is It Time to Move on from BCG?

Rachel Passarelli, Vignesh T Packiam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel PassarelliDivision of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Vignesh T PackiamDivision of Urology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8397-7797

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
NIH HHS P30CA072720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) encompasses approximately three-quarters of all bladder cancer (BC) diagnoses. Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) has been the long-standing gold standard treatment for patients following endoscopic resection. However, despite reasonable efficacy, recurrence rates are still suboptimal, and this, combined with treatment tolerability and BCG shortages, has prompted an investigation into alternative treatment modalities. Advances in this landscape have been predominantly for patients with BCG-unresponsive disease, and there are currently four FDA-approved treatments for these patients. More recently, trials have emerged looking for alternatives to BCG for patients who are treatment-naïve. We performed a literature search via PubMed to find recent publications on alternatives to BCG, as well as a search on clinicaltrials.gov and recent conference presentations for ongoing clinical trials. Studies have shown that combination intravesical chemotherapy, combination intravesical therapy with BCG, and combination intravenous therapy with BCG preliminarily have good efficacy and safety profiles in this disease space. Ongoing trials are underway, and we anticipate as these studies mature, there will be a shift in NMIBC treatment regimens.

Indexed as

BCGBCG alternativesintravesical chemotherapynon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Identifiers

PMID39064152
PMCPMC11277665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.