Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39064006›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024

Understanding the Barriers to Prostate Cancer Population-Based Early Detection Programs: The PRAISE-U BEST Survey.

Katharina Beyer, Renée C A Leenen, Lionne D F Venderbos, Jozien Helleman, Sebastiaan Remmers, Vera Vasilyeva, Juan Gomez Rivas, Erik Briers, Thomas Frese, Josep Vilaseca and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Katharina BeyerDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Renée C A LeenenDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-4561-562X
Lionne D F VenderbosDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jozien HellemanDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan RemmersDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-6448
Vera VasilyevaEuropean Association of Urology, Policy Office, 6842 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0003-2703-5625
Juan Gomez RivasDepartment of Urology, Clínico San Carlos University Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0556-3035
Erik BriersEuropa Uomo, 2018 Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-8449
Thomas FreseWONCA Europe, Institute for Development of Family Medicine, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Josep VilasecaWONCA Europe, Institute for Development of Family Medicine, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0002-1577-5728
Shlomo VinkerWONCA Europe, Institute for Development of Family Medicine, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Renata ChloupkovaNational Screening Centre, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4091-104X
Ondrej MajekNational Screening Centre, Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0034-3084
Lieven AnnemansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8305-7210
Pieter VynckierDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research, Ghent University, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
Partha BasuInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 90627 69366 Lyon, France.
Arunah ChandranInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization, 90627 69366 Lyon, France.
Roderick van den BerghDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarah CollenEuropean Association of Urology, Policy Office, 6842 Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Hendrik van PoppelEuropean Association of Urology, Policy Office, 6842 Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-8578
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3015 Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6967-1708
On Behalf Of The Praise-U Consortium

Funding

Co-Funded by the European Union 101101217World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2022, the European Commission updated its recommendation on cancer screening, inviting the Member States (MSs) to explore the feasibility of stepwise implementation of population-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa). In line with this recommendation, the PRAISE-U (Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union (EU)) project was initiated. As part of the PRAISE-U, we aim to understand the current practice towards early detection in the EU MSs, the barriers to implementing or planning population-based screening programmes, and potential solutions to overcome these barriers.

methodsWe adapted the Barriers to Effective Screening Tool (BEST) survey to the PCa context. However, it has not been validated in this context. We translated it into all spoken languages in the EU27 and disseminated it to different stakeholders across the EU using a snowballing approach.

resultsWe received 410 responses from 55 countries, of which 301 (73%) were from the 27 EU MSs. The most represented stakeholder group was urologists (218 (54%)), followed by general practitioners (GPs) (83 (21%)), patient representatives (35 (9%)), policy stakeholders (27 (7%)), researchers (23 (6%)), oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, nurses, and others (16 (4%)) and one industry representative. Among all respondents, 286 (69%) reported the absence of a population-based screening programme, mainly attributed to resource limitations and a lack of political and medical society support. Out of these 286 respondents, 196 (69%) indicated that opportunistic screening is being applied in their country, and 199 (70%) expressed their support for population-based screening programmes (which was highest amongst patient representatives and urologists and lowest amongst GPs and policy stakeholders). The highest scored barriers were lack of political support, insufficient operational resources, and inadequate participation. Suggested solutions to overcome these included awareness campaigns, consensus meetings, political lobbying and European guidelines (to overcome political support barriers), compatible IT systems (to overcome operational barriers), and easy access (to overcome participation barriers).

conclusionsParticipants have noted the presence of opportunistic screening, and particularly urologists and patient representatives expressed their support for the establishment of a population-based PCa screening programme. Nevertheless, successful implementation of population-based screening programmes is complex; it requires political and medical society support, operational resources and capacity, awareness campaigns, as well as the development of protocols, guidelines, and legal frameworks.

Indexed as

barriersearly detectionpopulation-based screeningprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID39064006
PMCPMC11277738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.