ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Comparative Analysis of Microabrasive Film Finishing Effects across Various Process Variants.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodology and Design for Abrasive Tools in Precision Grinding Processes.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Innovative Solutions in the Design of Microfinishing Attachments for Surface Finishing with Abrasive Films.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Carbon Texture Formation on the Surface of Titanium Alloy Grade 5 (Ti-6Al-4V) During Finishing with Abrasive Films.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Unit Load of Abrasive Grains in the Machining Zone During Microfinishing with Abrasive Films.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Surface Finishing Efficiency of Titanium Alloy Grade 5 (Ti-6Al-4V) After Superfinishing Using Abrasive Films.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The paper investigates various methods of microfinishing and arrives at the best technique to produce a very smooth surface. Various setups, with and without oscillation, were developed, together with a microfinishing attachment used on conventional lathes and milling machines. The workpiece material used was an amorphous nickel-phosphorus Ni-P alloy. The surface roughness parameters, such as Sa, Sv, and Sp, were measured with the TalySurf CCI6000 instrument. For the measurement of the surface protrusions, an "analysis of islands" technique was used at various levels of cut-off. The 2BA method-machining below the workpiece axis with oscillation-turned out to be the most effective method applied because it had the highest density of protrusions while having the smallest value of surface roughness. Non-oscillation with the machining zone below the axis also becomes effective, indicating that repositioning can compensate for a lack of oscillation. Already, the very compact surface structure achieved with minimized depths in the valleys by the 2BA method supported the improvement in tribological performance and increase in load-carrying capacity, together with lubricant retention enhancement. These results show that the microfinishing process can be optimized by parameter tuning, and also, non-oscillating methods could come to be a practical alternative, probably reducing the complexity of equipment and cutting costs. Further studies need to be aimed at the scalability of these methods and their application to other materials and fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.