ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Randomized Clinical Trial on Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases: Two-Year Follow-Up.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07128589 (Clinical Evaluation of 3M), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Evaluation of 3M(TM) Filtek(TM) Supreme Flowable Composites for Class IV and Veneers
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Minimally invasive management of lower midline diastema: A case report and literature review.Medicine · 2026Review
- Pink-White Esthetic Optimization in Excessive Gingival Display Using Crown Lengthening and Direct Composite Veneering.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- A dual-matrix technique for direct composite veneers using liquid dam and pull-through contouring: a case report.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Patient Preferences for Direct versus Indirect Dental Veneers: Associations with Durability, Socioeconomic Status, and Satisfaction.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- [Long-term prognosis and influencing factors of anterior composite resin restoration].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025Review
- 6-year clinical performance of prefabricated and clear template-formed resin composite veneers.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Clinical assessment of direct composite veneer and indirect veneers using a minimally invasive preparation technique.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Ceramic Dental Restorations-From Materials Sciences to Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, laminate veneer restorations should be considered as a minimally invasive treatment option for several aesthetic reasons. This study compared direct composite veneers' and indirect ceramic laminate veneers' longevity in multiple diastema closures. A total of 28 patients with a mean age of 26 years received 60 direct resin composite (Estelite Asteria; n = 14) and 60 indirect ceramic veneers (IPS e.max Press; n = 14) on the maxillary anterior teeth with diastema closure. Veneers were evaluated at baseline and thereafter every 6 months for up to 2 years using USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact and chi-squared tests, while Kaplan-Meier curve was used to assess time to event. In total, three failures were observed in the form of debonding (n = 1) and fracture (n = 2) in the indirect ceramic veneers. No significant difference was observed between the survival rates of composite and ceramic veneers (Estelite Asteria: 93.4%, IPS e.max Press: 95%;
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.