ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Machine-Learning-Based Characterization and Inverse Design of Metamaterials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart window films with ultra-broadband radiative regulation for all-season building energy saving.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Data-driven multiscale design of composite biomaterials: Integrating experiments, imaging, and computational modeling for biomedical engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Biomimetic Lattice Structures Design and Manufacturing for High Stress, Deformation, and Energy Absorption Performance.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metamaterials, characterized by unique structures, exhibit exceptional properties applicable across various domains. Traditional methods like experiments and finite-element methods (FEM) have been extensively utilized to characterize these properties. However, exploring an extensive range of structures using these methods for designing desired structures with excellent properties can be time-intensive. This paper formulates a machine-learning-based approach to expedite predicting effective metamaterial properties, leading to the discovery of microstructures with diverse and outstanding characteristics. The process involves constructing 2D and 3D microstructures, encompassing porous materials, solid-solid-based materials, and fluid-solid-based materials. Finite-element methods are then employed to determine the effective properties of metamaterials. Subsequently, the Random Forest (RF) algorithm is applied for training and predicting effective properties. Additionally, the Aquila Optimizer (AO) method is employed for a multiple optimization task in inverse design. The regression model generates accurate estimation with a coefficient of determination higher than 0.98, a mean absolute percentage error lower than 0.088, and a root mean square error lower than 0.03, indicating that the machine-learning-based method can accurately characterize the metamaterial properties. An optimized structure with a high Young's modulus and low thermal conductivity is designed by AO within the first 30 iterations. This approach accelerates simulating the effective properties of metamaterials and can design microstructures with multiple excellent performances. The work offers guidance to design microstructures in various practical applications such as vibration energy absorbers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.