ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2024
The Advancement of Waterjet-Guided Laser Cutting System for Enhanced Surface Quality in AISI 1020 Steel Sheets.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Laser Processing Technology of Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of a water-guided laser on the cutting performance of AISI 1020 steel sheets of various thicknesses by comparing the results with respect to a conventional laser. For this purpose, a novel nozzle design has been devised enabling the delivery of laser beams to the workpiece conventionally as well as through water guidance. Diverging from prior literature, a fiber laser is used with a high wavelength and a laser power output of 1 kW. Experiments are conducted on steel sheets with thicknesses ranging from 1.5 mm to 3 mm using three different cutting speeds and laser power levels. Analysis focuses on assessing surface roughness, burr formation and heat effects on the cut surfaces for both conventional and waterjet-guided cutting. Surface roughness is evaluated by using a 3D profilometer and cut surfaces are examined through SEM imaging. The results showed that the waterjet-guided laser system greatly reduced surface roughness and minimized problems associated with traditional laser cutting such as kerf, dross adherence and thermal damage. The study revealed that cutting speed had a greater effect on surface roughness reduction than laser power, with the most noticeable differences occurring in thinner sheets. Furthermore, the investigation suggests that the waterjet-guided laser cutting system demonstrates superior performance relative to conventional methods, particularly in surface quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.