Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39063487›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Mental Health Applications of Generative AI and Large Language Modeling in the United States.

Sri Banerjee, Pat Dunn, Scott Conard, Asif Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sri BanerjeeSchool of Health Sciences and Public Policy, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6872-4983
Pat DunnCenter for Health Technology & Innovation American Heart Association, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3997-8335
Scott ConardConverging Health, Irving, TX 75039, USA.
Asif AliMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7368-9983

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has flourished in recent years. More specifically, generative AI has had broad applications in many disciplines. While mental illness is on the rise, AI has proven valuable in aiding the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. However, there is little to no research about precisely how much interest there is in AI technology. (2) Methods: We performed a Google Trends search for "AI and mental health" and compared relative search volume (RSV) indices of "AI", "AI and Depression", and "AI and anxiety". This time series study employed Box-Jenkins time series modeling to forecast long-term interest through the end of 2024. (3) Results: Within the United States, AI interest steadily increased throughout 2023, with some anomalies due to media reporting. Through predictive models, we found that this trend is predicted to increase 114% through the end of the year 2024, with public interest in AI applications being on the rise. (4) Conclusions: According to our study, we found that the awareness of AI has drastically increased throughout 2023, especially in mental health. This demonstrates increasing public awareness of mental health and AI, making advocacy and education about AI technology of paramount importance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMental HealthAnxietyDepressionHumansMental DisordersUnited StatesChatGPTdiagnostic accuracylarge language modelingmental healthpredictive analyticsprevention

Identifiers

PMID39063487
PMCPMC11276907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.