Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39063449›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

The Role of Health Information Sources on Cervical Cancer Literacy, Knowledge, Attitudes and Screening Practices in Sub-Saharan African Women: A Systematic Review.

Joyline Chepkorir, Dominique Guillaume, Jennifer Lee, Brenice Duroseau, Zhixin Xia, Susan Wyche, Jean Anderson, Hae-Ra Han

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Public Awareness and Feasibility of Social Marketing for Cholangiocarcinoma Prevention Through Multi-channel Media in Thailand: Lessons for Emerging Diseases.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joyline ChepkorirInstitute of Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2273-418X
Dominique GuillaumeSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Jennifer LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4224-0160
Brenice DuroseauSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Zhixin XiaDepartment of Hematological Malignancies, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Susan WycheDepartment of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6151-2913
Jean AndersonDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Hae-Ra HanSchool of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths among Sub-Saharan African women. This systematic review aimed to identify information sources and their relation to cervical cancer knowledge, literacy, screening, and attitudes. Peer-reviewed literature was searched on 2 March 2022, and updated on 24 January 2023, in four databases-CINAHL Plus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Eligible studies included those that were empirical, published after 2002, included rural women, and reported on information sources and preferences. The quality of the selected articles was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data extraction was conducted on an Excel spreadsheet, and a narrative synthesis was used to summarize findings from 33 studies. Healthcare workers were the most cited information sources, followed by mass media, social networks, print media, churches, community leaders, the Internet, and teachers. Community leaders were preferred, while healthcare workers were the most credible sources among rural women. There was generally low cervical cancer knowledge, literacy, and screening uptake, yet high prevalence of negative attitudes toward cervical cancer and its screening; these outcomes were worse in rural areas. A content analysis revealed a positive association of health information sources with cervical cancer literacy, knowledge, screening, and positive screening attitudes. Disparities in cervical cancer prevention exist between rural and urban Sub-Saharan African women.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleHumansInformation Sourcescancer preventioncancer screening attitudescervical cancer knowledgecervical cancer literacycervical cancer screeninghealth information sources

Identifiers

PMID39063449
PMCPMC11277219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.