Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39063350›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Application of Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Glycerol Monostearate as Binder Agents for Protein Powder Production from Honey Bee Brood Using Foam-Mat Drying Technique.

Supakit Chaipoot, Rewat Phongphisutthinant, Pairote Wiriyacharee, Gochakorn Kanthakat, Worachai Wongwatcharayothin, Chalermkwan Somjai, Khanchai Danmek, Bajaree Chuttong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Supakit ChaipootMultidisciplinary Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9817-306X
Rewat PhongphisutthinantMultidisciplinary Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1038-176X
Pairote WiriyachareeResearch Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7052-0779
Gochakorn KanthakatFaculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0005-2956-3581
Worachai WongwatcharayothinFaculty of Agro-Industry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-4290-7201
Chalermkwan SomjaiProcessing and Product Development Factory, The Royal Project Foundation, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-0347-4979
Khanchai DanmekSchool of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, Thailand.
Bajaree ChuttongMeliponini and Apini Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-2902

Funding

Fundamental Research 2023, Chiang Mai University FF66/011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the development of protein powder from honey bee drone broods using foam-mat drying, a scalable method suitable for community enterprises, as well as the preservation of bee broods as a food ingredient. Initially, honey bee broods were pre-treated by boiling and steaming, with steamed bee brood (S_BB) showing the highest protein content (44.71 g/100 g dry basis). A factorial design optimized the powder formulation through the foam-mat drying process, incorporating varying concentrations of S_BB, glycerol monostearate (GMS), and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). The physicochemical properties of the resulting powder, including yield, color spaces, water activity, solubility, protein content, and total amino acids, were evaluated. The results showed that foam-mat drying produced a stable protein powder. The binders (CMC and GMS) increased the powder's yield and lightness but negatively affected the hue angle (yellow-brown), protein content, and amino acid content. The optimal quantities of the three variables (S_BB, GMS, and CMC) were determined to be 30 g, 6 g, and 1.5 g, or 80%, 16%, and 4%, respectively. Under this formulation, the protein powder exhibited a protein content of 19.89 g/100 g. This research highlights the potential of bee brood protein powder as a sustainable and nutritious alternative protein source, enhancing food diversification and security.

Indexed as

bee broodbinder agentsfoam-mat drying techniqueprotein powder

Identifiers

PMID39063350
PMCPMC11276076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.