ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Dynamic Compressive Stress Relaxation Model of Tomato Fruit Based on Long Short-Term Memory Model.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tomatoes are prone to mechanical damage due to improper gripping forces during automated harvest and postharvest processes. To reduce this damage, a dynamic viscoelastic model based on long short-term memory (LSTM) is proposed to fit the dynamic compression stress relaxation characteristics of the individual fruit. Furthermore, the classical stress relaxation models involved, the triple-element Maxwell and Caputo fractional derivative models, are compared with the LSTM model to validate its performance. Meanwhile, the LSTM and classical stress relaxation models are used to predict the stress relaxation characteristics of tomato fruit with different fruit sizes and compression positions. The results for the whole test dataset show that the LSTM model achieves a RMSE of 2.829×10-5 Mpa and a MAPE of 0.228%. It significantly outperforms the Caputo fractional derivative model by demonstrating a substantial enhancement with a 37% decrease in RMSE and a 36% reduction in MAPE. Further analysis of individual tomato fruit reveals the LSTM model's performance, with the minimum RMSE recorded at the septum position being 3.438×10-5 Mpa, 31% higher than the maximum RMSE at the locule position. Similarly, the lowest MAPE at the septum stands at 0.375%, outperforming the highest MAPE at the locule position by a significant margin of 90%. Moreover, the LSTM model consistently reports the smallest discrepancies between the predicted and observed values compared to classical stress relaxation models. This accuracy suggests that the LSTM model could effectively supplant classical stress relaxation models for predicting stress relaxation changes in individual tomato fruit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.