Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39062976›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

CBD Versus CBDP: Comparing In Vitro Receptor-Binding Activities.

Mehdi Haghdoost, Scott Young, Alisha K Holloway, Matthew Roberts, Ivori Zvorsky, Marcel O Bonn-Miller

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehdi HaghdoostNalu Bio Inc., 38 Keyes Avenue, Suite 117, San Francisco, CA 94129, USA.
Scott YoungCharlotte's Web, 700 Tech Court, Louisville, CO 80027, USA.
Alisha K HollowayPhylos Bioscience, 2455 NW Nicolai Street STE B-O6, Portland, OR 97210, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9810-389X
Matthew RobertsNalu Bio Inc., 38 Keyes Avenue, Suite 117, San Francisco, CA 94129, USA.
Ivori ZvorskyCharlotte's Web, 700 Tech Court, Louisville, CO 80027, USA.
Marcel O Bonn-MillerCharlotte's Web, 700 Tech Court, Louisville, CO 80027, USA.

Funding

Charlotte's Web N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytocannabinoids with seven-carbon alkyl chains (phorols) have gained a lot of attention, as they are commonly believed to be more potent versions of typical cannabinoids with shorter alkyl chains. At the time of this article, cannabidiphorol (CBDP) and tetrahydrocannabiphorol (THCP) can both be purchased in the North American market, even though their biological activities are nearly unknown. To investigate their relative potency, we conducted in vitro receptor-binding experiments with CBDP (cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor antagonism, serotonin 5HT-1A agonism, dopamine D2S (short form) agonism, and mu-opioid negative allosteric modulation) and compared the observed activity with that of CBD. To our knowledge, this is the first publication to investigate CBDP's receptor activity in vitro. A similar activity profile was observed for both CBD and CBDP, with the only notable difference at the CB2 receptor. Contrary to common expectations, CBD was found to be a slightly more potent CB2 antagonist than CBDP (

Indexed as

Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2AnimalsCannabidiolCannabinoidsDronabinolHumansProtein BindingReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Opioid, muCannabidiolCannabinoidsDronabinolReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB2Receptors, Dopamine D2Receptors, Opioid, muagonistantagonistscannabidiolcannabidiphorolcannabinoid receptor

Identifiers

PMID39062976
PMCPMC11277192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.