ArticleGenes2024
Myopic Macular Hole and Detachment after Gene Therapy in Atypical RPE65 Retinal Dystrophy: A Case Report.
Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Retinal Viral Gene Therapy: Impact of Route of Administration on Serious Adverse Events-A Systematic Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Pooled it
- SS-OCT-guided dual-arm master-slave robotic system for in vivo subretinal injection in porcine eyes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo report a case of macular hole and detachment occurring after the subretinal injection of Voretigene Neparvovec (VN) in a patient affected by atypical RPE65 retinal dystrophy with high myopia and its successful surgical management. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report a case of a 70-year-old man treated with VN in both eyes. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.7 LogMar in the right eye (RE) and 0.92 LogMar in the left eye (LE). Axial length was 29.60 mm in the RE and 30.28 mm in the LE. Both eyes were pseudophakic. In both eyes, fundus examination revealed high myopia, posterior staphyloma, and extended retinal atrophy areas at the posterior pole, circumscribing a central island of surviving retina. Both eyes were treated with VN subretinal injection, but a full-thickness macular hole and retinal detachment occurred in the LE three weeks after surgery. The patient underwent 23-gauge vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and the inverted flap technique with sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% tamponade. Postoperative follow-up showed that the macular hole was closed and the BCVA was maintained.
conclusionsOur experience suggests that patients with atypical RPE65 retinal dystrophy and high myopia undergoing VN subretinal injection require careful management to minimize the risk of macular hole and detachment occurrence and promptly detect and address these potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.