ReviewBiomolecules2024
Calreticulin-Enigmatic Discovery.
Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of a Novel Antibacterial Function of Mammalian Calreticulin.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- p.Phe508del-CFTR Trafficking: A Protein Quality Control Perspective Through UPR, UPS, and Autophagy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Calreticulin-From the Endoplasmic Reticulum to the Plasma Membrane-Adventures of a Wandering Protein.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Calreticulin (CRT) is an intrinsically disordered multifunctional protein that plays essential roles intra-and extra-cellularly. The Michalak laboratory has proposed that CRT was initially identified in 1974 by the MacLennan laboratory as the high-affinity Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.