Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39062395›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Can 'Script Elicitation' Methods Be Used to Promote Physical Activity? An Acceptability Study.

William Peer, Ruth R Mathews, Xueli Ng, Winson Ho Chun Wong, Benjamin Gardner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William PeerDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Elizabeth Fry Building, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Ruth R MathewsDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Elizabeth Fry Building, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Xueli NgDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Elizabeth Fry Building, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Winson Ho Chun WongDepartment of Psychology, University of Surrey, Elizabeth Fry Building, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.
Benjamin GardnerHabit Application and Theory (HabitAT) Group, Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Elizabeth Fry Building, Guildford GU2 7XH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-5934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustaining physical activity may require incorporating activity into everyday routines. Yet, many such routines are executed habitually, so people may not recognise physical activity opportunities. 'Script Elicitation'-a novel intervention method whereby participants detail the content and structure of their routines and are supported to plan modifications to those routines-has not yet been applied to physical activity. This mixed-methods study assessed the acceptability of Script Elicitation for increasing physical activity among office workers. Eleven UK office workers completed the one-to-one Script Elicitation procedure, describing their typical before-, during-, or after-work routines and receiving guidance on incorporating activity into those routines. One week later, they rated the acceptability of the method and completed a semi-structured interview. Physical activity was self-reported at baseline and at the one-week follow-up. Acceptability was descriptively assessed on two quantitative criteria (no clear decrease in physical activity; above-midpoint acceptability scores) and qualitatively explored via Thematic Analysis. The acceptability criteria were met, and participants reported raised awareness of routines and physical activity increases. Script Elicitation appears potentially suitable for promoting activity within everyday routines. If effectiveness is shown in a more rigorous trial, future work will need to develop script-based methods for efficient delivery at scale as a public health intervention.

Indexed as

behavioural sciencehealth behaviourhealth promotionpsychology

Identifiers

PMID39062395
PMCPMC11273430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.