Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39062108›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Large Language Models and Genomics for Summarizing the Role of microRNA in Regulating mRNA Expression.

Balu Bhasuran, Sharanya Manoharan, Oviya Ramalakshmi Iyyappan, Gurusamy Murugesan, Archana Prabahar, Kalpana Raja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Balu BhasuranSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9890-4627
Sharanya ManoharanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Stella Maris College, Chennai 600086, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7269-3526
Oviya Ramalakshmi IyyappanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Chennai 641112, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gurusamy MurugesanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Green Fields, Guntur District, Vaddeswaram 522302, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Archana PrabaharCenter for Gene Regulation in Health and Disease, Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences (BGES), Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6426-4548
Kalpana RajaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3156-4197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

microRNA (miRNA)-messenger RNA (mRNA or gene) interactions are pivotal in various biological processes, including the regulation of gene expression, cellular differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, and development, as well as the maintenance of cellular homeostasis and pathogenesis of numerous diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, and metabolic conditions. Understanding the mechanisms of miRNA-mRNA interactions can provide insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. However, extracting these interactions efficiently from a huge collection of published articles in PubMed is challenging. In the current study, we annotated a miRNA-mRNA Interaction Corpus (MMIC) and used it for evaluating the performance of a variety of machine learning (ML) models, deep learning-based transformer (DLT) models, and large language models (LLMs) in extracting the miRNA-mRNA interactions mentioned in PubMed. We used the genomics approaches for validating the extracted miRNA-mRNA interactions. Among the ML, DLT, and LLM models, PubMedBERT showed the highest precision, recall, and F-score, with all equal to 0.783. Among the LLM models, the performance of Llama-2 is better when compared to others. Llama 2 achieved 0.56 precision, 0.86 recall, and 0.68 F-score in a zero-shot experiment and 0.56 precision, 0.87 recall, and 0.68 F-score in a three-shot experiment. Our study shows that Llama 2 achieves better recall than ML and DLT models and leaves space for further improvement in terms of precision and F-score.

Indexed as

deep learninggenomicslarge language modelsmachine learningmiRNA–mRNA interactionsnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39062108
PMCPMC11274411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.