Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39062093›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2024

Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Spotlight on Emerging Molecular Biomarkers.

Antonio Mestrovic, Nikola Perkovic, Dorotea Bozic, Marko Kumric, Marino Vilovic, Josko Bozic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Advanced Combination Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Engineered Tissue Models to Decode Host-Microbiota Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antonio MestrovicDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 2, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-0156-2748
Nikola PerkovicDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 2, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-2920
Dorotea BozicDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 2, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Marko KumricDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-9696-3359
Marino VilovicDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-5433-5063
Josko BozicDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-1634-0635

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remain challenging in terms of understanding their causes and in terms of diagnosing, treating, and monitoring patients. Modern diagnosis combines biomarkers, imaging, and endoscopic methods. Common biomarkers like CRP and fecal calprotectin, while invaluable tools, have limitations and are not entirely specific to IBD. The limitations of existing markers and the invasiveness of endoscopic procedures highlight the need to discover and implement new markers. With an ideal biomarker, we could predict the risk of disease development, as well as the possibility of response to a particular therapy, which would be significant in elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease. Recent research in the fields of machine learning, proteomics, epigenetics, and gut microbiota provides further insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and is also revealing new biomarkers. New markers, such as BAFF, PGE-MUM, oncostatin M, microRNA panels, αvβ6 antibody, and S100A12 from stool, are increasingly being identified, with αvβ6 antibody and oncostatin M being potentially close to being presented into clinical practice. However, the specificity of certain markers still remains problematic. Furthermore, the use of expensive and less accessible technology for detecting new markers, such as microRNAs, represents a limitation for widespread use in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the need for non-invasive, comprehensive markers is becoming increasingly important regarding the complexity of treatment and overall management of IBD.

Indexed as

biomarkersfecal calprotectininflammatory bowel diseasemachine learningmetabolomicsmicroRNAoncostatin Mpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID39062093
PMCPMC11274502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.