ReviewBiomedicines2024
Lutetium-177-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy: What Is the Value of Post-Therapeutic Imaging?
Review in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Radiobiological evaluation of the therapeutic effect of silver-111 for the ISOLPHARM project.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lutetium-177 (Lu-177)-labelled radioligand therapies (RLT) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) present a promising treatment for patients with progressive metastasized castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Personalized dosimetry, facilitated by post-therapeutic imaging, offers the potential to enhance treatment efficacy by customizing radiation doses to individual patient needs, thereby maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing toxicity to healthy tissues. However, implementing personalized dosimetry is resource-intensive, requiring multiple single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT)/CT scans and posing significant logistical challenges for both healthcare facilities and patients. Despite these challenges, personalized dosimetry can lead to optimized radiation delivery, improved safety, and better management of complex cases. Nevertheless, the financial and resource burdens complicate its adoption in routine clinical practice. While the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) supports personalized dosimetry, standardization is lacking due to these practical constraints. Further research and streamlined methodologies are essential to balance the benefits and feasibility of personalized dosimetry, potentially improving treatment outcomes for mCRPC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.