Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061968›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Deep Learning Evaluation of Glaucoma Detection Using Fundus Photographs in Highly Myopic Populations.

Yen-Ying Chiang, Ching-Long Chen, Yi-Hao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yen-Ying ChiangGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Ching-Long ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-7753
Yi-Hao ChenGraduate Institute of Life Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to use deep learning to identify glaucoma and normal eyes in groups with high myopia using fundus photographs.

methodsPatients who visited Tri-Services General Hospital from 1 November 2018 to 31 October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with high myopia (spherical equivalent refraction of ≤-6.0 D) were included in the current analysis. Meanwhile, patients with pathological myopia were excluded. The participants were then divided into the high myopia group and high myopia glaucoma group. We used two classification models with the convolutional block attention module (CBAM), an attention mechanism module that enhances the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to investigate glaucoma cases. The learning data of this experiment were evaluated through fivefold cross-validation. The images were categorized into training, validation, and test sets in a ratio of 6:2:2. Grad-CAM visual visualization improved the interpretability of the CNN results. The performance indicators for evaluating the model include the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsA total of 3088 fundus photographs were used for the deep-learning model, including 1540 and 1548 fundus photographs for the high myopia glaucoma and high myopia groups, respectively. The average refractive power of the high myopia glaucoma group and the high myopia group were -8.83 ± 2.9 D and -8.73 ± 2.6 D, respectively (

conclusionsGlaucoma in individuals with high myopia was identified from their fundus photographs.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefundus photographsglaucomamyopia

Identifiers

PMID39061968
PMCPMC11274657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.