ArticleBiomedicines2024
Deep Learning Evaluation of Glaucoma Detection Using Fundus Photographs in Highly Myopic Populations.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- AUBADE-syn: a novel deep learning ensemble method for glaucoma detection using synthetic fundus images on imbalanced datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence framework for multi-pathology risk assessment from retinal fundus images: deep learning approach to 15-disease screening.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating multimodal large language models for differential diagnosis of high myopia versus high myopia with Glaucoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Development of an Algorithm to Assist in the Diagnosis of Combined Retinal Vein Occlusion and Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence derived grading of mustard gas induced corneal injury and opacity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A comparative study of machine learning models for automated detection and classification of retinal diseases in Ghana.PloS one · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: opportunities, challenges, and ethical considerations.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Review
- Diagnostic challenges in high myopia: identification of sight-threatening complications and the role of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Managing Myopic Glaucoma-Beyond Structural Fragility and Diagnostic Challenges: Review Article.Journal of current glaucoma practiceReview
- Shaping the future of myopia with artificial intelligence: Mapping trends and promising directions.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to use deep learning to identify glaucoma and normal eyes in groups with high myopia using fundus photographs.
methodsPatients who visited Tri-Services General Hospital from 1 November 2018 to 31 October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with high myopia (spherical equivalent refraction of ≤-6.0 D) were included in the current analysis. Meanwhile, patients with pathological myopia were excluded. The participants were then divided into the high myopia group and high myopia glaucoma group. We used two classification models with the convolutional block attention module (CBAM), an attention mechanism module that enhances the performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), to investigate glaucoma cases. The learning data of this experiment were evaluated through fivefold cross-validation. The images were categorized into training, validation, and test sets in a ratio of 6:2:2. Grad-CAM visual visualization improved the interpretability of the CNN results. The performance indicators for evaluating the model include the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsA total of 3088 fundus photographs were used for the deep-learning model, including 1540 and 1548 fundus photographs for the high myopia glaucoma and high myopia groups, respectively. The average refractive power of the high myopia glaucoma group and the high myopia group were -8.83 ± 2.9 D and -8.73 ± 2.6 D, respectively (
conclusionsGlaucoma in individuals with high myopia was identified from their fundus photographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.