ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation of Denoising Performance of ResNet Deep Learning Model for Ultrasound Images Corresponding to Two Frequency Parameters.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Depth-Dependent Performance of Residual Networks for Low-Count PET Image Restoration Using a Dedicated 3D-Printed Striatum Phantom.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Models for Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Using Plasma Proteomic Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasound imaging is widely used for accurate diagnosis due to its noninvasive nature and the absence of radiation exposure, which is achieved by controlling the scan frequency. In addition, Gaussian and speckle noises degrade image quality. To address this issue, filtering techniques are typically used in the spatial domain. Recently, deep learning models have been increasingly applied in the field of medical imaging. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of a convolutional neural network-based residual network (ResNet) deep learning model for noise reduction when Gaussian and speckle noises were present. We compared the results with those obtained from conventional filtering techniques. A dataset of 500 images was prepared, and Gaussian and speckle noises were added to create noisy input images. The dataset was divided into training, validation, and test sets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The ResNet deep learning model, comprising 16 residual blocks, was trained using optimized hyperparameters, including the learning rate, optimization function, and loss function. For quantitative analysis, we calculated the normalized noise power spectrum, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and root mean square error. Our findings showed that the ResNet deep learning model exhibited superior noise reduction performance to median, Wiener, and median-modified Wiener filter algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.