Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061782›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Integrating Convolutional Neural Networks with Attention Mechanisms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classification of Brain Tumors.

Zahid Rasheed, Yong-Kui Ma, Inam Ullah, Mahmoud Al-Khasawneh, Sulaiman Sulmi Almutairi, Mohammed Abohashrh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. DTCNet: finger flexion decoding with three-dimensional ECoG data.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zahid RasheedSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Yong-Kui MaSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China.
Inam UllahDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Sujeong-gu, Seongman 13120, Republic of Korea.
Mahmoud Al-KhasawnehSchool of Computing, Skyline University College, University City Sharjah, Sharjah 1797, United Arab Emirates.
Sulaiman Sulmi AlmutairiDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, Qassim University, Qassim 51452, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4810-6018
Mohammed AbohashrhDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the classification of brain tumors is constrained by the complex and time-consuming characteristics of traditional diagnostics procedures, mainly because of the need for a thorough assessment across several regions. Nevertheless, advancements in deep learning (DL) have facilitated the development of an automated system that improves the identification and assessment of medical images, effectively addressing these difficulties. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have emerged as steadfast tools for image classification and visual perception. This study introduces an innovative approach that combines CNNs with a hybrid attention mechanism to classify primary brain tumors, including glioma, meningioma, pituitary, and no-tumor cases. The proposed algorithm was rigorously tested with benchmark data from well-documented sources in the literature. It was evaluated alongside established pre-trained models such as Xception, ResNet50V2, Densenet201, ResNet101V2, and DenseNet169. The performance metrics of the proposed method were remarkable, demonstrating classification accuracy of 98.33%, precision and recall of 98.30%, and F1-score of 98.20%. The experimental finding highlights the superior performance of the new approach in identifying the most frequent types of brain tumors. Furthermore, the method shows excellent generalization capabilities, making it an invaluable tool for healthcare in diagnosing brain conditions accurately and efficiently.

Indexed as

brain tumorsclassificationdeep learninghealthcaremagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)medical imageneural network

Identifiers

PMID39061782
PMCPMC11273980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.