ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Utilizing a Pathomics Biomarker to Predict the Effectiveness of Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer Treatment.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Supporting Histopathologic and Molecular Characterization of Gynecological Cancers: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Redefining Risk, Biomarkers, and Precision Therapy for Hereditary Ovarian Cancer: A Review.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Prediction of lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma using a PET/CT radiomics-based ensemble learning model and its pathological basis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- PySpatial: A High-Speed Whole Slide Image Pathomics Toolkit.IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging · 2025Article
- Prognostic and predictive value of pathohistological features in gastric cancer and identification of SLITRK4 as a potential biomarker for gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this investigation is to develop and initially assess a quantitative image analysis scheme that utilizes histopathological images to predict the treatment effectiveness of bevacizumab therapy in ovarian cancer patients. As a widely accessible diagnostic tool, histopathological slides contain copious information regarding underlying tumor progression that is associated with tumor prognosis. However, this information cannot be readily identified by conventional visual examination. This study utilizes novel pathomics technology to quantify this meaningful information for treatment effectiveness prediction. Accordingly, a total of 9828 features were extracted from segmented tumor tissue, cell nuclei, and cell cytoplasm, which were categorized into geometric, intensity, texture, and subcellular structure features. Next, the best performing features were selected as the input for SVM (support vector machine)-based prediction models. These models were evaluated on an open dataset containing a total of 78 patients and 288 whole slides images. The results indicated that the sufficiently optimized, best-performing model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.8312. When examining the best model's confusion matrix, 37 and 25 cases were correctly predicted as responders and non-responders, respectively, achieving an overall accuracy of 0.7848. This investigation initially validated the feasibility of utilizing pathomics techniques to predict tumor responses to chemotherapy at an early stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.