ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Validation of Pelvis and Trunk Range of Motion as Assessed Using Inertial Measurement Units.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Concurrent Validity and Between-System Agreement of a Commercial Wearable Inertial Sensor System for Gait and Postural Sway Assessment in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating Wearable Sensors and Clinical Tools for Assessing Pelvic Gait Symmetry During ACL Recovery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Greater Lumbopelvic Motion Is Associated with Faster Hip Flexion in Soccer Players.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Validity, reliability, and user perspectives of the newly developed joint angle measurement system: a preliminary study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomechanics of Human Motion and Its Clinical Applications: Instrumented Gait Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Trunk and pelvis range of motion (ROM) is essential to perform activities of daily living. The ROM may become limited with aging or with neuromusculoskeletal disorders. Inertial measurement units (IMU) with out-of-the box software solutions are increasingly being used to assess motion. We hypothesize that the accuracy (validity) and reliability (consistency) of the trunk and pelvis ROM during steady-state gait in normal individuals as measured using the Opal APDM 6 sensor IMU system and calculated using Mobility Lab version 4 software will be comparable to a gold-standard optoelectric motion capture system. Thirteen healthy young adults participated in the study. Trunk ROM, measured using the IMU was within 5-7 degrees of the motion capture system for all three planes and within 10 degrees for pelvis ROM. We also used a triad of markers mounted on the sternum and sacrum IMU for a head-to-head comparison of trunk and pelvis ROM. The IMU measurements were within 5-10 degrees of the triad. A greater variability of ROM measurements was seen for the pelvis in the transverse plane. IMUs and their custom software provide a valid and reliable measurement for trunk and pelvis ROM in normal individuals, and important considerations for future applications are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.