Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061730›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Multi-View Deep Learning Model for Thyroid Nodules Detection and Characterization in Ultrasound Imaging.

Sanaz Vahdati, Bardia Khosravi, Kathryn A Robinson, Pouria Rouzrokh, Mana Moassefi, Zeynettin Akkus, Bradley J Erickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanaz VahdatiArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Bardia KhosraviArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8024-339X
Kathryn A RobinsonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Pouria RouzrokhArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-0751
Mana MoassefiArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Zeynettin AkkusDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3920-1515
Bradley J EricksonArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-6095

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid Ultrasound (US) is the primary method to evaluate thyroid nodules. Deep learning (DL) has been playing a significant role in evaluating thyroid cancer. We propose a DL-based pipeline to detect and classify thyroid nodules into benign or malignant groups relying on two views of US imaging. Transverse and longitudinal US images of thyroid nodules from 983 patients were collected retrospectively. Eighty-one cases were held out as a testing set, and the rest of the data were used in five-fold cross-validation (CV). Two You Look Only Once (YOLO) v5 models were trained to detect nodules and classify them. For each view, five models were developed during the CV, which was ensembled by using non-max suppression (NMS) to boost their collective generalizability. An extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model was trained on the outputs of the ensembled models for both views to yield a final prediction of malignancy for each nodule. The test set was evaluated by an expert radiologist using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS). The ensemble models for each view achieved a mAP0.5 of 0.797 (transverse) and 0.716 (longitudinal). The whole pipeline reached an AUROC of 0.84 (CI 95%: 0.75-0.91) with sensitivity and specificity of 84% and 63%, respectively, while the ACR-TIRADS evaluation of the same set had a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 34% (

Indexed as

deep learningthyroid nodule assessmentultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39061730
PMCPMC11273835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.