ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Radiomics and Deep Features: Robust Classification of Brain Hemorrhages and Reproducibility Analysis Using a 3D Autoencoder Neural Network.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer-based ultrasound radiomics for novel multi-task automated segmentation and classification of ovarian tumors.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-task learning framework for hepatocellular carcinoma segmentation and histological grading using fused multi-phase MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Integrating histopathology and immune marker analysis for machine learning-based colorectal cancer prognostics.Diagnostic pathology · 2026Article
- A multicenter deep learning framework integrating radiomics and vision transformers for comprehensive ovarian tumor analysis from ultrasound imaging.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Multi-class transformer-based segmentation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and surrounding structures in CT imaging: a multi-center evaluation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Transformer-based and CNN-based models for clinically effective 2D and 3D pelvic bone segmentation in CT imaging.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A multi-center study of transformer-based CNNs for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation on 3D FLAIR MRI.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Comparing Handcrafted Radiomics Versus Latent Deep Learning Features of Admission Head CT for Hemorrhagic Stroke Outcome Prediction.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025Article
- Reproducible meningioma grading across multi-center MRI protocols via hybrid radiomic and deep learning features.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Novel multi-task learning for Alzheimer's stage classification using hippocampal MRI segmentation, feature fusion, and nomogram modeling.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Optimizing meningioma grading with radiomics and deep features integration, attention mechanisms, and reproducibility analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection Using Spiral Drawings and Advanced Machine Learning Techniques.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Advanced multi-label brain hemorrhage segmentation using an attention-based residual U-Net model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Article
- Automated classification of chondroid tumor using 3D U-Net and radiomics with deep features.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of convolutional neural networks and vision transformers in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions.Medicine · 2025Article
- Advanced feature fusion of radiomics and deep learning for accurate detection of wrist fractures on X-ray images.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A novel framework for esophageal cancer grading: combining CT imaging, radiomics, reproducibility, and deep learning insights.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- A Radiomic Model for Gliomas Grade and Patient Survival Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advanced machine learning framework for enhancing breast cancer diagnostics through transcriptomic profiling.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the reproducibility of machine learning models that integrate radiomics and deep features (features extracted from a 3D autoencoder neural network) to classify various brain hemorrhages effectively. Using a dataset of 720 patients, we extracted 215 radiomics features (RFs) and 15,680 deep features (DFs) from CT brain images. With rigorous screening based on Intraclass Correlation Coefficient thresholds (>0.75), we identified 135 RFs and 1054 DFs for analysis. Feature selection techniques such as Boruta, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), XGBoost, and ExtraTreesClassifier were utilized alongside 11 classifiers, including AdaBoost, CatBoost, Decision Trees, LightGBM, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Neural Networks, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN). Evaluation metrics included Area Under the Curve (AUC), Accuracy (ACC), Sensitivity (SEN), and F1-score. The model evaluation involved hyperparameter optimization, a 70:30 train-test split, and bootstrapping, further validated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and q-values. Notably, DFs showed higher accuracy. In the case of RFs, the Boruta + SVM combination emerged as the optimal model for AUC, ACC, and SEN, while XGBoost + Random Forest excelled in F1-score. Specifically, RFs achieved AUC, ACC, SEN, and F1-scores of 0.89, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively. Among DFs, the ExtraTreesClassifier + Naive Bayes combination demonstrated remarkable performance, attaining an AUC of 0.96, ACC of 0.93, SEN of 0.92, and an F1-score of 0.92. Distinguished models in the RF category included SVM with Boruta, Logistic Regression with XGBoost, SVM with ExtraTreesClassifier, CatBoost with XGBoost, and Random Forest with XGBoost, each yielding significant q-values of 42. In the DFs realm, ExtraTreesClassifier + Naive Bayes, ExtraTreesClassifier + Random Forest, and Boruta + k-NN exhibited robustness, with 43, 43, and 41 significant q-values, respectively. This investigation underscores the potential of synergizing DFs with machine learning models to serve as valuable screening tools, thereby enhancing the interpretation of head CT scans for patients with brain hemorrhages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.