Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061725›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Radiomics and Deep Features: Robust Classification of Brain Hemorrhages and Reproducibility Analysis Using a 3D Autoencoder Neural Network.

Salar Bijari, Sahar Sayfollahi, Shiwa Mardokh-Rouhani, Sahar Bijari, Sadegh Moradian, Ziba Zahiri, Seyed Masoud Rezaeijo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Salar BijariDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedical, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj P.O. Box 66177-13446, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7656-0475
Sahar SayfollahiDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 14496-14535, Iran.
Shiwa Mardokh-RouhaniMechanical Engineering Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj P.O. Box 66177-15175, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-2354-1582
Sahar BijariDepartment of Aging and Health, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd P.O. Box 89151-73160, Iran.
Sadegh MoradianDepartment of Radiology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran P.O. Box 14197-33151, Iran.
Ziba ZahiriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Golestan Hospital, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz P.O. Box 61357-15794, Iran.
Seyed Masoud RezaeijoDepartment of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz P.O. Box 61357-15794, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-4525-0025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the reproducibility of machine learning models that integrate radiomics and deep features (features extracted from a 3D autoencoder neural network) to classify various brain hemorrhages effectively. Using a dataset of 720 patients, we extracted 215 radiomics features (RFs) and 15,680 deep features (DFs) from CT brain images. With rigorous screening based on Intraclass Correlation Coefficient thresholds (>0.75), we identified 135 RFs and 1054 DFs for analysis. Feature selection techniques such as Boruta, Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE), XGBoost, and ExtraTreesClassifier were utilized alongside 11 classifiers, including AdaBoost, CatBoost, Decision Trees, LightGBM, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Neural Networks, Random Forest, Support Vector Machines (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN). Evaluation metrics included Area Under the Curve (AUC), Accuracy (ACC), Sensitivity (SEN), and F1-score. The model evaluation involved hyperparameter optimization, a 70:30 train-test split, and bootstrapping, further validated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and q-values. Notably, DFs showed higher accuracy. In the case of RFs, the Boruta + SVM combination emerged as the optimal model for AUC, ACC, and SEN, while XGBoost + Random Forest excelled in F1-score. Specifically, RFs achieved AUC, ACC, SEN, and F1-scores of 0.89, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.80, respectively. Among DFs, the ExtraTreesClassifier + Naive Bayes combination demonstrated remarkable performance, attaining an AUC of 0.96, ACC of 0.93, SEN of 0.92, and an F1-score of 0.92. Distinguished models in the RF category included SVM with Boruta, Logistic Regression with XGBoost, SVM with ExtraTreesClassifier, CatBoost with XGBoost, and Random Forest with XGBoost, each yielding significant q-values of 42. In the DFs realm, ExtraTreesClassifier + Naive Bayes, ExtraTreesClassifier + Random Forest, and Boruta + k-NN exhibited robustness, with 43, 43, and 41 significant q-values, respectively. This investigation underscores the potential of synergizing DFs with machine learning models to serve as valuable screening tools, thereby enhancing the interpretation of head CT scans for patients with brain hemorrhages.

Indexed as

braindeep featureshemorrhagemachine learningradiomics featuresreproducible

Identifiers

PMID39061725
PMCPMC11273742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.