Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061710›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Influencing Factors Regarding the Severity of Peri-Implantitis and Peri-Implant Mucositis.

Csilla Benedek, Bernadette Kerekes-Máthé, Liana Bereșescu, Imola Zsuzsa Buka, Zsuzsanna Bardocz-Veres, Ildikó Geréb, Krisztina Ildikó Mártha, Kinga Mária Jánosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Csilla BenedekDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Bernadette Kerekes-MáthéDepartment of Tooth and Dental Arch Morphology, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-9643-6383
Liana BereșescuDepartment of Preventive and Community Dentistry, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0176-1894
Imola Zsuzsa BukaDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Zsuzsanna Bardocz-VeresDepartment of Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5510-2635
Ildikó GerébWindisch Dental-Wident, 1053 Budapest, Hungary.
Krisztina Ildikó MárthaDepartment of Orthodontics, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Kinga Mária JánosiDepartment of Fixed Prosthodontics, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-0015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scientific literature is increasingly focused on peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, which are biological outcomes of dental implant treatment. BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe present study aimed to evaluate the two most critical complications of dental implantation, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, through the prism of different influencing factors.

methodsWe followed 40 patients, with a total number of 92 dental implants, divided into three age groups: under 35 years, between 35 and 55 years, and older than 55 years. Patients were also divided into groups according to the time since implant placement: 1-3 years, 4-7 years, and more than 7 years. The patients were examined, and periodontal pocket depth, peri-implant pocket depth, Löe-Silness gingival index, mucosal thickness, and keratinized mucosal width were recorded; bone resorption was measured on radiographs using a 2D image analysis method; and a questionnaire was also conducted.

resultsBone resorption was highest in the 35-55 age group (3.09 ± 0.04 mm) and for implants placed 4-7 years ago (3.39 ± 0.12 mm). Females had a mean bone resorption of 3.4 ± 0.15 mm and males of 2.45 ± 0.07 mm. Statistically, there was a significant difference only in the Löe-Silness index: the 35-55 age group had the highest values (

conclusionsThere were no statistically significant differences between the time since implant placement and the degree of bone resorption, nor between sexes. Peri-implant inflammation may occur at any age, regardless of the lifetime of the implants.

Indexed as

bone resorptionperi-implantitisperi-implant mucositis

Identifiers

PMID39061710
PMCPMC11275279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.