ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Implementing Explainable Machine Learning Models for Practical Prediction of Early Neonatal Hypoglycemia.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and digital technologies transforming neonatal respiratory assessment: a scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypoglycemia is a common metabolic disorder that occurs in the neonatal period. Early identification of neonates at risk of developing hypoglycemia can optimize therapeutic strategies in neonatal care. This study aims to develop a machine learning model and implement a predictive application to assist clinicians in accurately predicting the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia within four hours after birth. Our retrospective study analyzed data from neonates born ≥35 weeks gestational age and admitted to the well-baby nursery between 1 January 2011 and 31 August 2021. We collected electronic medical records of 2687 neonates from a tertiary medical center in Southern Taiwan. Using 12 clinically relevant features, we evaluated nine machine learning approaches to build the predictive models. We selected the models with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for integration into our hospital information system (HIS). The top three AUC values for the early neonatal hypoglycemia prediction models were 0.739 for Stacking, 0.732 for Random Forest and 0.732 for Voting. Random Forest is considered the best model because it has a relatively high AUC and shows no significant overfitting (accuracy of 0.658, sensitivity of 0.682, specificity of 0.649, F1 score of 0.517 and precision of 0.417). The best model was incorporated in the web-based application integrated into the hospital information system. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values indicated mode of delivery, gestational age, multiparity, respiratory distress, and birth weight < 2500 gm as the top five predictors of neonatal hypoglycemia. The implementation of our machine learning model provides an effective tool that assists clinicians in accurately identifying at-risk neonates for early neonatal hypoglycemia, thereby allowing timely interventions and treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.