ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Clinical Trial Validation of Automated Segmentation and Scoring of Pulmonary Cysts in Thoracic CT Scans.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of lymphangioleiomyomatosis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2025Guideline
- Diffuse cystic lung diseases-a primer for radiologists.BJR open · 2026Review
- Cystic Lung Phantom to Validate Clinical CT Protocols.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Review
- Multicystic Interstitial Lung Disease Due to a Novel Biallelic C-C Chemokine Receptor Type 2 Variant.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cystic lung diseases such as lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a CT-based cyst score that measures the percentage of the lung volume occupied by cysts is a common index of the cyst burden in the lungs. Although the current semi-automatic measurement of the cyst score is well established, it is susceptible to human operator variabilities. We recently developed a fully automatic method incorporating adaptive features in place of manual adjustments. In this clinical study, the automatic method is validated against the standard method in several aspects. These include the agreement between the cyst scores of the two methods, the agreement of each method with independent tests of pulmonary function, and the temporal consistency of the measurements in the consecutive visits of the same patients. We found that the automatic method agreed with the standard method as well as the agreement between two trained operators running the same standard method; both methods obtained the same level of correlation with laboratory pulmonary function tests; the automated method had better temporal consistency than the standard method (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.