ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluation and Limitations of the Novel Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay Technique for Measuring Total Tau Protein in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients with Human Prion Disease: A 10-Year Prospective Study (2011-2020).
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecently, the investigation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for diagnosing human prion diseases (HPD) has garnered significant attention. Reproducibility and accuracy are paramount in biomarker research, particularly in the measurement of total tau (T-tau) protein, which is a crucial diagnostic marker. Given the global impact of the coronavirus disease pandemic, the frequency of measuring this protein using one of the world's fully automated assays, chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEA), has increased. At present, the diagnosis and monitoring of neurological diseases mainly rely on traditional methods, but their accuracy and responsiveness are limited. There is limited knowledge of the accuracy of CLEA in tau measurements. We aimed to measure T-tau protein using CLEA and to elucidate its merits and limitations.
methodsWe randomly selected 60 patients with rapidly progressive dementia, using ELISA and CLEA analysis of cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Additionally, we used Western blotting to detect the presence of 14-3-3 protein and employed real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assays to analyze the same set of samples. Furthermore, we examined the correlation coefficient between ELISA and CLEA results in a subset of 60 samples. Moreover, using CLEA, we evaluated the diurnal reproducibility, storage stability, dilutability, and freeze-thaw effects in three selected samples.
resultsIn 172 patients, 172 samples were extracted, with each patient providing only one sample, and a total of 88 (35 men and 53 women) tested positive for HPD in the RT-QuIC assay. In contrast, all CSF samples from the remaining 84 patients without HPD (50 men and 34 women) tested negative in the RT-QuIC assay. Both ELISA and CLEA showed perfect sensitivity and specificity (100%) in measuring T-tau protein levels. In addition, ELISA and CLEA are similar in terms of measurement sensitivity and marginal effect of detection extrema. CLEA analysis exhibited instability for certain samples with T-tau protein levels exceeding 2000 pg/mL, leading to low reproducibility during dilution analysis.
conclusionsOur findings indicate that CLEA outperforms ELISA in terms of diurnal reproducibility, storage stability, and freeze-thaw effects. However, ELISA demonstrated superior performance in the dilution assay. Therefore, it is imperative to develop innovative approaches for the dilution of biomarker samples for CLEA measurements during clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.