Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061647›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Predictive Modeling of COVID-19 Readmissions: Insights from Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches.

Wei Kit Loo, Wingates Voon, Anwar Suhaimi, Cindy Shuan Ju Teh, Yee Kai Tee, Yan Chai Hum, Khairunnisa Hasikin, Kareen Teo, Hang Cheng Ong, Khin Wee Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wei Kit LooDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Wingates VoonLee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang 43000, Malaysia.
Anwar SuhaimiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-0988
Cindy Shuan Ju TehDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Yee Kai TeeLee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang 43000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0263-6358
Yan Chai HumLee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang 43000, Malaysia.
Khairunnisa HasikinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-0471-3820
Kareen TeoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Hang Cheng OngInfectious Diseases Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 56300, Malaysia.
Khin Wee LaiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-8602-0533

Funding

2020 APT EBC-C (Extra-Budgetary Contributions from China) Project on Promoting the Use of ICT for Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals IF015-2021Impact-Oriented Interdisciplinary Research Grant (IIRG), Universiti Malaya IIRG001B-2021IISS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This project employs artificial intelligence, including machine learning and deep learning, to assess COVID-19 readmission risk in Malaysia. It offers tools to mitigate healthcare resource strain and enhance patient outcomes. This study outlines a methodology for classifying COVID-19 readmissions. It starts with dataset description and pre-processing, while the data balancing was computed through Random Oversampling, Borderline SMOTE, and Adaptive Synthetic Sampling. Nine machine learning and ten deep learning techniques are applied, with five-fold cross-validation for evaluation. Optuna is used for hyperparameter selection, while the consistency in training hyperparameters is maintained. Evaluation metrics encompass accuracy, AUC, and training/inference times. Results were based on stratified five-fold cross-validation and different data-balancing methods. Notably, CatBoost consistently excelled in accuracy and AUC across all tables. Using ROS, CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy (0.9882 ± 0.0020) with an AUC of 1.0000 ± 0.0000. CatBoost maintained its superiority in BSMOTE and ADASYN as well. Deep learning approaches performed well, with SAINT leading in ROS and TabNet leading in BSMOTE and ADASYN. Decision Tree ensembles like Random Forest and XGBoost consistently showed strong performance.

Indexed as

COVID-19deep learningmachine learningpredictionreadmission

Identifiers

PMID39061647
PMCPMC11275856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.