ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Rigorous 2D-3D Registration Method for a High-Speed Bi-Planar Videoradiography Imaging System.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-speed biplanar videoradiography can derive the dynamic bony translations and rotations required for joint cartilage contact mechanics to provide insights into the mechanical processes and mechanisms of joint degeneration or pathology. A key challenge is the accurate registration of 3D bone models (from MRI or CT scans) with 2D X-ray image pairs. Marker-based or model-based 2D-3D registration can be performed. The former has higher registration accuracy owing to corresponding marker pairs. The latter avoids bead implantation and uses radiograph intensity or features. A rigorous new method based on projection strategy and least-squares estimation that can be used for both methods is proposed and validated by a 3D-printed bone with implanted beads. The results show that it can achieve greater marker-based registration accuracy than the state-of-the-art RSA method. Model-based registration achieved a 3D reconstruction accuracy of 0.79 mm. Systematic offsets between detected edges in the radiographs and their actual position were observed and modeled to improve the reconstruction accuracy to 0.56 mm (tibia) and 0.64 mm (femur). This method is demonstrated on in vivo data, achieving a registration precision of 0.68 mm (tibia) and 0.60 mm (femur). The proposed method allows the determination of accurate 3D kinematic parameters that can be used to calculate joint cartilage contact mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.