Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061569›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Data-Mining Methodology to Improve the Scientific Production Quality in Turkey Meat and Carcass Characterization Studies.

José Ignacio Salgado Pardo, Francisco Javier Navas González, Antonio González Ariza, José Manuel León Jurado, Nuno Carolino, Inês Carolino, Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo, María Esperanza Camacho Vallejo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

José Ignacio Salgado PardoDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-469X
Francisco Javier Navas GonzálezDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0093-5151
Antonio González ArizaAgropecuary Provincial Centre, Diputación de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
José Manuel León JuradoAgropecuary Provincial Centre, Diputación de Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.
Nuno CarolinoCentro de Investigação Vasco da Gama, Escola Universitária Vasco da Gama, 3020-210 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-7380
Inês CarolinoCentro de Investigação Vasco da Gama, Escola Universitária Vasco da Gama, 3020-210 Coimbra, Portugal.
Juan Vicente Delgado BermejoDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-8838
María Esperanza Camacho VallejoAndalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Alameda del Obispo, 14004 Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional P20_00893Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades FPU FellowshipMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present research aims to describe how turkey meat and carcass quality traits define the interest of the scientific community through the quality standards of journals in which studies are published. To this end, an analysis of 92 research documents addressing the study of turkey carcass and meat quality over the last 57 years was performed. Meat and carcass quality attributes were dependent variables and included traits related to carcass dressing, muscle fiber, pH, colorimetry, water-holding capacity, texture, and chemical composition. The independent variables comprised publication quality traits, including journal indexation, database, journal impact factor (JIF), quartile, publication area, and JIF percentage. For each dependent variable, a data-mining chi-squared automatic interaction detection (CHAID) decision tree was developed. Carcass or piece yield was the only variable that did not show an impact on the publication quality. Moreover, color and pH measurements taken at 72 h postmortem showed a negative impact on publication interest. On the other hand, variables including water-retaining attributes, colorimetry, pH, chemical composition, and shear force traits stood out among the quality-enhancing variables due to their low inclusion in papers, while high standards improved power.

Indexed as

biostatistical toolchemical profiledata-miningphysical traitspublication quality traitsturkey meat quality

Identifiers

PMID39061569
PMCPMC11273658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.