Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061528›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Footbathing and Foot Trimming, and No Quarantine: Risks for High Prevalence of Lameness in a Random Sample of 269 Sheep Flocks in England, 2022.

Katharine Eleanor Lewis, Martin Green, Rachel Clifton, Emma Monaghan, Naomi Prosser, Elizabeth Nabb, Laura Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katharine Eleanor LewisSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-6402
Martin GreenSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6408-6443
Rachel CliftonSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4474-1340
Emma MonaghanInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3411-7613
Naomi ProsserSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8391-7153
Elizabeth NabbAnimal & Plant Health Agency Veterinary Investigation Centre, Starcross, Exeter EX6 8PE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7281-0203
Laura GreenInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board 1000000122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 2004, the prevalence of lameness in sheep flocks in England has reduced as farmers have adopted evidence-based management practices to control lameness. In 2011, the Farm Animal Welfare Council proposed a target prevalence of <2% lameness in sheep by 2021. This study investigated whether that target had been achieved and determined which practices were associated with prevalence of lameness. A postal questionnaire was sent to 1000 randomly selected farmers to investigate the prevalence of lameness and management practices in 2022. The geometric mean prevalence of lameness was <2% in ewes and lambs, but the median was 3%; approximately 26% flocks had <2% lameness. Data were analysed using robust variable selection with multivariable linear models. Farmers that quarantined ewes for ≥3 weeks and did not use foot bathing or foot trimming to prevent lameness had 40-50% lower prevalence of lameness than those not using these practices. Fewer farmers (19.0%) were always using parenteral antimicrobials to treat footrot, an effective practice, than in previous research (49.7%). We conclude that the target of <2% lameness in England has been achieved by 26% of farmers, and further work is required for more farmers to follow the evidence-based management practices to minimise lameness.

Indexed as

ewesexploratory variable selectionfootbathingfoot trimminglambslamenessquarantine

Identifiers

PMID39061528
PMCPMC11273439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.