Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061204›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Revolutionizing Skin Cancer Triage: The Role of Patient-Initiated Teledermoscopy in Remote Diagnosis.

Emilie A Foltz, Joanna Ludzik, Sancy Leachman, Elizabeth Stoos, Teri Greiling, Noelle Teske, Lara Clayton, Alyssa L Becker, Alexander Witkowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Analysis of trichoscopic images using deep neural networks for the diagnosis and activity assessment of alopecia areata - a retrospective study.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emilie A FoltzDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Joanna LudzikDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3089-8109
Sancy LeachmanDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Elizabeth StoosDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3574-0802
Teri GreilingDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0028-8986
Noelle TeskeDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Lara ClaytonDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Alyssa L BeckerDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Alexander WitkowskiDepartment of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTeledermatology, defined as the use of remote imaging technologies to provide dermatologic healthcare services to individuals in a distant setting, has grown considerably in popularity since its widespread implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Teledermoscopy employs a smartphone dermatoscope attachment paired with a smartphone camera to visualize colors and microstructures within the epidermis and superficial dermis that cannot be seen with the naked eye ABCD criteria alone.

methodsOur retrospective observational cohort and case-control study evaluated the utility of loaning a smartphone dermatoscope attachment to patients for remote triage of self-selected lesions of concern for skin cancer. The primary outcome was the number (percentage) of in-person follow-up visits required for patients who submitted lesion images, either with or without accompanying dermoscopic images. A medical record review was conducted on all Oregon Health & Science University Department of Dermatology spot check image submissions utilizing the smartphone dermatoscopes between August 2020 and August 2022. De-identified dermoscopic images of lesions that included corresponding non-dermoscopic clinical images in their submission (n = 70) were independently reviewed by a blinded expert dermoscopist. The expert used standard clinical algorithms (ABCD criteria for clinical images; dermoscopy three-point checklist for dermoscopic images) to determine whether the imaged lesion should be converted to an in-person visit for further evaluation and consideration for biopsy.

resultsOf the 70 lesions submitted with corresponding clinical and dermoscopy images, 60 met the criteria for in-person evaluation from clinical (non-dermoscopic) image review compared to 28 meeting the criteria for in-person evaluation from dermoscopic images of the same lesion. Thus, a 53% reduction in conversion to an in-person consultation with the addition of smartphone dermatoscope images in virtual lesion triage was observed (

conclusionImplementing patient-led teledermoscopy may reduce the frequency of in-person visits for benign lesions and consequently improve access to in-person dermatology consultations for patients with concerning and possibly malignant lesions.

Indexed as

dermatology accessdermoscopyearly detectionmelanoma triageskin cancer triageteledermatologyteledermoscopytelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39061204
PMCPMC11274391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.