Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39061193›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Surgical Interventions Following Radiotherapy in Spinal Metastases with Intermediate Instability: A Risk Factor Analysis: The Korean Society of Spinal Tumor Multicenter Study (KSST 2022-02).

Se-Jun Park, Jin Ho Kim, Yong Chan Ahn, Woong Sub Koom, Hwa Kyung Byun, Young-Hoon Kim, Sang-Il Kim, Dong-Ho Kang, On Behalf Of The Korean Society Of Spinal Tumor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Comparative study on effectiveness between laminoplasty with unilateral spinous process-ligament complex preservation and traditional laminoplasty for thoracolumbar intraspinal tumors].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Se-Jun ParkDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Jin Ho KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
Yong Chan AhnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-8472
Woong Sub KoomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-7750
Hwa Kyung ByunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Yongin 16995, Republic of Korea.
Young-Hoon KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1237-4600
Sang-Il KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
Dong-Ho KangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
On Behalf Of The Korean Society Of Spinal Tumor

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne important determinant in choosing a treatment modality is spinal instability. Clear management guidelines are suggested for stable and unstable spinal metastatic lesions, but lesions in the intermediate instability category (SINS [spinal instability neoplastic score] score of 7-12) remain a clinical dilemma. This study aims to analyze the risk factors necessitating surgical intervention after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with those lesions.

methodsA multicenter cohort of 469 patients with spinal metastases of intermediate instability who received radiotherapy (RT) as the initial treatment between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively enrolled. All patients were neurologically intact at the time of RT. According to the performance of surgical intervention after RT, various clinical and radiographic risk factors for surgical intervention were compared between surgery and non-surgery groups using uni- and multivariate analyses. A recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed using significant determinants identified in multivariate analysis.

resultsThe mean age at the time of RT was 59.9 years and there were 198 females. The lung was the most common primary site. During the mean follow-up duration of 18.2 months, surgical treatment was required in 79 (17.9%) of patients. The most common surgical method was decompressive laminectomy with stabilization (62.0%), followed by vertebrectomy with stabilization (22.8%) and stabilization only (15.2%). The mean SINS for the total cohort was 9.0. Multivariate regression analyses revealed that the primary tumor site of the lung, liver, and kidney, higher Bilsky grades of ESCC, lytic bone lesions, and higher EQD2

conclusionsSurgical intervention was performed in 17.9% of patients with intermediate instability after RT as the initial treatment. The primary tumor site of the lung, liver, and kidney, higher Bilsky grade of ESCC, and EQD210 were the most important determinants for expecting the probability of surgical intervention. Therefore, the optimal treatment strategy needs to be devised by carefully evaluating the risk of surgical intervention.

Indexed as

intermediate instabilityradiotherapyrisk factorspinal metastasissurgical intervention

Identifiers

PMID39061193
PMCPMC11275119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.